Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2014
Publication Title
Journal of Legal Studies
Publication Title (Abbreviation)
J. Legal Stud. 137
Volume
43
First Page
137
Last Page
153
Abstract
In the law enforcement literature there is a presumption—supported by some experimental and econometric evidence—that criminals are more responsive to increases in the certainty than the severity of punishment. Under a general set of assumptions, this implies that criminals are risk seeking. We show that this implication is no longer valid when forfeiture of illegal gains and the possibility of unsuccessful attempts are considered. Therefore, when drawing inferences concerning offenders’ attitudes toward risk based on their responses to various punishment schemes, special attention must be paid to whether and to what extent offenders’ illegal gains can be forfeited and whether increases in the probability of punishment affect the probability of attempts being successful. We discuss policy implications related to our observations.
Rights
© 2014 The University of Chicago
Faculty Biography
http://law.fsu.edu/our-faculty/profiles/mungan
Recommended Citation
Murat C. Mungan and Jonathan Klick,
Forfeiture of Illegal Gains, Attempts and Implied Risk Preferences, 43
J. Legal Stud. 137
137
(2014),
Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/109
Comments
First published in Journal of Legal Studies.