Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1993
Publication Title
Fordham International Law Journal
Publication Title (Abbreviation)
Fordham Int'l. L.J.
Volume
17
Issue
3
First Page
531
Last Page
546
Abstract
This Essay considers the applicability of a particular model of legal ethics, neutral partisanship, to American lawyers’ representation of those who violate, or are accused of violating, international human rights. I maintain that neutral partisanship, a deficient model for American lawyers in their domestic practice, is even more problematic when applied in the international arena. The central question is this: are there limits, short of engaging in illegal conduct, that should constrain lawyers in the representation of those who violate international human rights? Neutral partisanship holds that any lawyer may, or, more strongly, must, pursue any legal end for any client by any legal means. I disagree, both in general and with respect to international human rights practice in particular.
Rights
© 1993 Rob Atkinson
Faculty Biography
http://www.law.fsu.edu/our-faculty/profiles/atkinson
Recommended Citation
Rob Atkinson,
Neutral Partisan Lawyering and International Human Rights, 17
Fordham Int'l. L.J.
531
(1993),
Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/380
Comments
First published in Fordham International Law Journal.