Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1973
Publication Title
The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Publication Title (Abbreviation)
J. Crim. L. & Criminology
Volume
64
Issue
1
First Page
2
Last Page
10
Abstract
The Supreme Court's decision abolishing the death penalty, at least as it existed in most jurisdictions, hardly represents the final resolution of the controversy over capital punishment. Given substantial public sentiment which apparently favors capital punishment in some form-voiced, for example, in the results of the recent referendum in California-various legislative bodies will face the question of whether capital punishment can and should be legislatively reinstated. In December 1972 the State of Florida became the first jurisdiction to pass judgment on this question. The legislature enacted a bill allowing imposition of the death penalty in certain circumstances. The two articles which follow highlight the competing policy and legal considerations which face legislatures after Furman, and illustrate one state's response to those considerations. The first article is a slightly revised version of a memorandum to the Florida Governor's Committee to Study Capital Punishment, submitted by the Committee's Legal Advisory Staff. It sketches the various possible legislative responses to Furman and recommends one. The second indicates other recommendations made to the legislators and comments on the ultimate legislative determination.
Rights
© Northwesters University School of Law 1973
Recommended Citation
Charles W. Ehrhardt, Phillip A. Hubbart, Harold Levinson, William McKinley Smiley, and Thomas A. Wills,
The Future of Capital Punishment in Florida: Analysis and Recommendations, 64
J. Crim. L. & Criminology
2
(1973),
Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/663
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons